Monthly Archives: October 2012

ConDem coalition proves a LibDem vote is wasted…

Anyone reading or listening to local news may well be forgiven for wondering just who is in Government. Recent publications have seem Leeds North West Lib Dem MP Greg Mulholland worrying about and criticising the decision to close local fire stations in response to government funding cuts; regional news has also seen Yorkshire Lib Dems attacking the Tories for closing Yorkshire Forward and therefore jeopardising the regions’s ability to lobby for and secure European regional development funding.

But who is in government?

Oh yes; it is a coalition of Tories and Lib Dems.

So it is Greg’s party and colleagues who are cutting the funding that means North Leeds will lose fire stations; he is responsible for the funding decisions he is now complaining about; blatantly trying to have it both ways is a Lib Dem tradition.

And the Lib Dems are equally to blame with the Tories for closing Yorkshire Forward. They are every bit a part of this government and the cuts and pain being inflicted on Yorkshire and Leeds.

So if they are now trying to campaign against the government they are part of because it isn’t working for Leeds you will be forgiven for wondering what is the point of voting Lib Dem. They are the government failing Leeds just as the Tories are; this is what voting Lib Dem delivers. If you want an alternative to the Tories voting Lib Dem won’t deliver it.

Advertisements

What we can learn from our Super Soar-away Summer of Sport…!

What a summer we’ve had; if the diamond jubilee wasn’t enough we’ve had the Euro 2012 Football Tournament (with the usual England exit in the Quarter Finals but without the angst ridden hype beforehand); Bradley Wiggins winning the Tour de France; then the Olympics and a magnificent performance by Team GB; the Para-Olympics and even more super human efforts; followed by the first man to win a tennis grand slam event in over 70 years when Andy Murray won the US Open. Its enough to make a tabloid sub-editor weep and a popularist politician salivate.

But there must be more to it than that, surely?

Just how did these great achievements come about? What can they tell us about how change really occurs (its not that many Olympiads ago that Team GB won virtually nothing) and just how different was the public reaction to the Olympics and Para-Olympics to the pre-event build up?

It’s easy to say we should take note of the number of medal winners who praised the Lottery Funding invested in elite sport for their ability to compete and win. Easy because it’s true; Excellence always comes at a cost, personal in terms of dedication and commitment and financial because nothing can realistically be achieved with nothing. Cameron’s re-jigged cabinet take note.

The public reaction to the Olympics and Para-Olympics is even more important however. The level of interest and gone far beyond those normally or even peripherally interested in sport; the impact has genuinely reached virtually every community in the UK and the need for a lasting and telling legacy is greater than even the most optimistic of the London 2012 bid team could ever have imagined.

In many ways the Para-Olympics have been even more amazing and have created a climate of opportunity that simply must not be squandered. Never before have people with disability been presented in such a positive light; and after two years of government propaganda around benefits creating an image of scroungers and dependency. The British public have shown a remarkable level of positive support for our para-Olympians that has delivered an opportunity to improve the understanding of disability that has perhaps never previously existed (and in doing so taught us all something about our own level of understanding and attitude). It has been said that London 2012 has shown the world a vision of disability through the eyes of the British. If that is true we have to take the window of opportunity to make that vision truly so in every community in the UK.

The media is full of how we are united in wanting the spirit of London 2012 to continue. So just how are we going to deliver on this tangible desire for a legacy.

Legacy is not just about finding the stars for Rio 2016 it is about changing attitudes and culture that make a difference to daily life; and if the public response to the Olympics has shown us anything it is that the British public want something that goes beyond austerity; that raises up and celebrates human and social potential; that above all creates and enables hope and belief to deliver.

With the backdrop of the post Olympic atmosphere and the emotion of Danny Boyle’s opening ceremony still resonating how can more cuts; less rights; the enablement of privilege and the passing around of blame really deliver?

Having seen what investment can both achieve and unite isn’t now time for a new plan, one that brings together our communities and that invests in people. It is telling that the only funding commitment made by the coalition in response to the success of Team GB has been to protect funding for elite sport until 2016. For community sport all we have had is the compulsion of all primary school children in the competitive sport and a claim that cuts to community and school sports actually represent an increase. More spin than Victoria Pendleton’s pedals…

The lesson from our super summer of sport is not just about youth, or involvement in sporting activities; it is not just about health and diet; it is about every aspect of our communities and about how we deliver a better quality of life for all.

This summer we have inspired more than a generation now we need to deliver a lasting legacy that matters.